 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted because this is a Wikipage I'm creating on Orchid Pharma for research / study purposes and it's not for any promotion. This is one of the listed fortune 500 drug company of the India and I feel it's important to have some summary of such a renowned company on wiki. --Orchidproject (talk) 11:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Almost everything in the article is promotional text. Nikthestoned 11:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted because I'm making wikipage for first time and not able to add citations presently. The page is currently under update. Please inform me where it appear promotional, and I will remove that text. Thanks--Orchidproject (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Everything below History is Promotional text. Please read this help page on writing your first article and when writing about a company you are associated with, make sure you maintain a neutral point of view as you do have somewhat a conflict of interest. Cheers Nikthestoned 11:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- What has been stated under the history section consists facts that can be independently verified. I am removing the speedy notice. If the tone is a problem, templates like peacock and weasel may be more appropriate rather than a trigger-happy speedy, especially given that an earlier speedy was contested - please see the article history. --Strategyprof (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Terrible article edit
This article is thoroughly soaked with advertising language. For example:
Orchid Pharma boasts of the "Orchidian Spirit" and assumes that this spirit makes it a best place to work with
I mean, are you serious? User:Strategyprof, did you actually read any of this article after "History"? It is impossible to independently verify most of the information below the History section. Keyword here is independently (meaning, independent of the company). This article is nowhere NEAR neutral point of view. Pages like this are seriously detrimental to Wikipedia's reputation. 128.115.27.10 (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)