Talk:Orange Line (MBTA)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Designate in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Designate (talk · contribs) 03:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This isn't an optimally well-researched article, but it clearly fits the critera as written.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Designate (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply