GA Reassessment
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article is clearly biased towards justifying Opus Dei although it makes an attempt to hide this. The basic methodology employed was to insert non-cited opinions into the article that praise Opus Dei while citing and neutering any comments that criticize OD.
The article also goes on at length when defending Opus Dei while creating short blurbs out of the criticisms against it. Examples:
Non-cited praise: "Members and people who have knowledge of Opus Dei activities however agree that this is not the truth." Referring to the controversies surrounding the organization.