Talk:Optical circulator
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Quantumavik in topic Circulators are not necessarily fiber optic
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Non-reciprocal
editI am confused by this edit, where the edit summary claims that optical activity "does not exemplify non-reciprocal optics". Is optical activity not non-reciprocal? I would think that it would be. A fuller explanation would be appreciated.--Srleffler (talk) 03:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Circulators are not necessarily fiber optic
editAlthough most commonly available in fiber, optical circulators could be free-space, or chip-based. I hope to improve the article to reflect this sometime later, but if another editor could already start working on this, it would be great! Quantumavik (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)