Talk:Optical black hole

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mortense in topic Contradiction?

Untitled

edit

Citation

edit

Should maybe be cited against the recent research at St Andrews http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/fibre.html Rick Townsend (talk) 20:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Definition

edit

Ryhenry23 (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)I felt that the definition was a little confusing, so I added a litte bit of a more basic definition.Reply

Black hole using fiber optics

edit

Ryhenry23 (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)I included some information about the experiment to create a black hole using fiber optics. I think it could use a little more but I am not finding much information and details about it.Reply

Table top experiment

edit

Ryhenry23 (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)I am reading about the experiment and it says it was a "table top" experiment. I don't know how I should incorporate this information or if it is even relevant.Reply

Dude, you literally copied and pasted from a news article. That's not okay. Nongendered (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contradiction?

edit

Regarding:

"...is not expected to mimic the quantum effects of a black hole, and thus not emit Hawking radiation. ..."

Doesn't this contradict with the following from Sonic black hole?

"In 2014, self-amplifying Hawking radiation was observed in an analogue black-hole laser"

--Mortense (talk) 19:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Black hole mimicking

edit

Please add examples, for example technological ones. Some merely mimic only the shape or not even that well (when the mimicked black hole disk fails to work for a particular project some use a fuzzball, which is NOT a black hole mimicking... but it started as a black hole mimicking before the evolution of the design).