Talk:Operation Freakout
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Freakout article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 20 December 2008, Operation Freakout was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
Syntax error in "Background"
editThere is a parenthetical that reads as follows: (subtitled "A chilling examination of the nature, beliefs and practices of the "now religion'"). A syntax error is here, as it should read: (subtitled "A chilling examination of the nature, beliefs and practices of the 'now religion'"). There is an erroneous double quote within a double quote structure, which ends with a single quote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.106.131 (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2023
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
the further reading list cites tony ortega's article "double crossed" - but it leads to a 404 error. Scientology created the page to destroy ortega's reputation. please remove the "double crossed" source from the further reading list
Telltaleatheist (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: Have updated the link. Not sure what you mean by "Scientology created the page to destroy ortega's reputation" - it's an article written by Ortega on the Phoenix New Times website, how does it harm Ortega's reputation? On the other hand, not entirely sure the piece needs to be on the further reading section for this article, neither Graham Berry not Robert Cipriano (which Ortega's piece focuses on) are mentioned here. Perhaps would be more appropriate at Scientology controversies, though it is already used as a citation there. Cannolis (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed that it is a Tony Ortega authored article. (I cleaned up the link a bit more.) Grorp (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- that's his name. that wasn't tony ortega. it was a slander article created by somebody else to destroy his reputation. if you read through the article it becomes clear. Telltaleatheist (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Telltaleatheist: If that were true, then why would Tony Ortega himself link to the article, twice, from his own website here and here? Search these two pages for "Double Crossed (the Graham Berry story)" and you'll see it links to the active version online at Phoenix New Times. However, I will look further into this. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 15:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed. I have verified that it was indeed written by Tony Ortega. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 18:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Closed. Case closed. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 18:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Telltaleatheist: If that were true, then why would Tony Ortega himself link to the article, twice, from his own website here and here? Search these two pages for "Double Crossed (the Graham Berry story)" and you'll see it links to the active version online at Phoenix New Times. However, I will look further into this. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 15:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
