Talk:Omagh bombing/Archives/2011/4
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Nick Cooper in topic April 2011 bombing
This is an archive of past discussions about Omagh bombing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
April 2011 bombing
There has been a new bombing in Omagh ([1]), can anyone include this in the article? Or should this article be moved to Omagh bombing (1998) and a new article Omagh bombing (2011) created? Rchard2scout (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think it could be added to this article. Let's wait and see what others think.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- People seem to forget that there were bombings all the time during the Troubles. Over 50 people were killed in and around Omagh. I don't see why this bombing should be included but not others. For those reasons I'd also oppose creating an article for it. ~Asarlaí 08:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- The reason I think it could be mentioned (no more than two sentences, mind with also inclusions of the earlier bombings and killings) is because the 1998 bombing was such a watershed event that subsequent attacks in the town are surely more notable than earlier ones back in the 1970s. Omagh was, as you say, a popular target due to its being a garrison town. I certainly don't feel a separate article is warranted and I staunchly oppose changing thos article's name to Omagh bombing (1998).--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Asarlaí, "were" being the operative word. We are now in different times, and considering the circumstances of the 1998 attack, another in the area - especially one that resulted in death - cannot be seen as anything other than significant. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- People seem to forget that there were bombings all the time during the Troubles. Over 50 people were killed in and around Omagh. I don't see why this bombing should be included but not others. For those reasons I'd also oppose creating an article for it. ~Asarlaí 08:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)