Talk:Okemah, Oklahoma

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bruin2 in topic Article reclassification


Photo?

edit

I love visiting Okemah and appreciate its rich Native American, African-American, and European-American history, so I am wondering if the town deserves to suffer from having its article illustrated by a lynching scene? Lynching is a horrible aspect of Oklahoma's history and I don't believe in glossing over the past, but on the other hand, Okemah certainly has much more to it than racist actions from the early 20th century. Would any other photos suffice? What do other people think? Uyvsdi (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)UyvsdiReply

The image is gone now, and I think that is best. It was fairly gruesome as the only image in the article at the time. I'm sure eventually there will be other, better photos to help illustrate the town. Narthring (talkcontribs) 04:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chief Okemah

edit

An article in the Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture supports the claim that the town was named for Chief Okemah, but says the chief was Creek. The Wikipedia says he was a Kickapoo, but with no reference citation to support the claim. Since the town is actually inside the border of the former Creek Nation, while the Kickapoo reservation was farther west, it would be useful to clear up the chief's identification. Was he Creek or Kickapoo? Perhaps some Wikipedia editor familiar with Okemah's history could do this. Bruin2 (talk) 16:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Education History section

edit

In the page it says that "no action was taken" but in the sourced article it says that the district is investigating. Am I confused on what an "action" is, or is the recently added section lacking a bit of neutrality? I'm leaning toward lacking neutrality considering the story is fairly recent and only one side of this controversy has been told. 70.189.122.209 (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Okemah, Oklahoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Article reclassification

edit

This article meets the requirements for Class C in WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 00:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply