This page was proposed for deletion by Swooch (talk·contribs) on 11 February 2013 with the comment: Notability? Sources? It was contested by Arxiloxos (talk·contribs) on 2013-02-11 with the comment: Deprodded: this is a subject that receives significant academic as well as popular attention. Unfortunately the article in its current state gave little hint of this. I've added some sources and content to start, and tagged for improvement.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Article should be deleted for similar reasons as "Lawyer Jokes" was deleted: there's nothing distinctive about office jokes. No need to have a Wiki article on every single humor topic, especially when the jokes are largely the same, with a few words substituted. Piano non troppo (talk) 07:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree. Also, only the articles for the comic Dilbert and some spanish webcomic link to this one.Swooch (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, the article has been fleshed out and changed topics. Where it was previously focused on humor about office situations, it's now about humor in the office, which I guess can be interesting, but I'm not sure anyone will come here looking for it. Swooch (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is Sosiaalisesti rajoittuneet really relevant enough to English-speaking readers to be included in the list of comic strips focusing on office humor? palpalpalpal (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
