Talk:OfferUp
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OfferUp article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Spam (at least a dozen) emails from OfferUp — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.99.78.100 (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Poor search functions:
→Very primitive Boolean function..., and the Wiki page look like it was write by public relationship department thought... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:58A:8604:3ABB:11C1:21E7:FAB8:6850 (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement top level tag edit
I think that the tag is warranted. As an experienced editor who is not deep in on researching this topic, I went through and did a few fixes that were easy given my limitations. I can do a few more but then it will be tough for me to go much further. The reason is that what remains is reasonably good and sourced material, but the chosen topics are basically what's good about the service and company. The does not mean that we need to add a "balancing" "what's bad" / criticism section. What it really needs an editor who is willing to read recent independent sources and add new material from those. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Beginner Used Auction edit
I am a beginner and would like some insight. 174.233.16.178 (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)