Talk:ODB++/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 08:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

A review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below.

• More sections.
• The article should have a little more context.
• The article seems confusing in the sections under Adoption. You can separate Criticism and Controversy for this reason.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Not too enamored with the mass of links for See also

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

A. References to sources:
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
C. No original research:

Is it broad in its coverage?

A. Major aspects:
B. Focused:

Is it neutral?

Fair representation without bias:

Is it stable?

No edit wars, etc:

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

---

Please note that if the article is not improved within seven days the nomination will be rejected.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 12:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I fixed the See also. How is it now? Woz2 (talk) 13:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Please fix the first point too.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 15:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm confused. Can you clarify? The first point says "Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below." but I'm not seeing what the word "below" refers to. What am I missing? Woz2 (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 16:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! What in particular confuses you? Woz2 (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Added an Intro section. Does this help? Woz2 (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 04:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmmmm... Not sure what to do next... Any thoughts on section headers that would help clarify the article? Woz2 (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Added "Adoption" section Woz2 (talk) 14:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 15:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Attempted to clarify Criticism section. Woz2 (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 05:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

How is it now? Woz2 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 12:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Potential ref from External links section

There was a comment from someone working on incorporating the links as references, so I thought I'd move it here so it doesn't get lost in cleanup: --Ronz (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

• https://web.archive.org/web/20110705120048/http://pcdandf.com/cms/designnews/8103-users-updating-adopting-ipc-data-transfer-spec-