Talk:Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Northern Aleppo offensive (February 2016), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Belligerents edit
All of the sources mentioned in this article (and all other that I've seen) mention the rebel factions during this conflict to be Jabhat Al-Nusra, Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham, Harakat Nouriddeen Al-Zinki, and Jaysh Al-Mujahiddeen (they mostly mention al-Nusra), and none of them refer to the Free Syrian Army. Although it seems the Free Syrian Army was involved in the siege initially, apparently it was not a major group in this conflict. --Z 09:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
al Masdar for the child soldier edit
al Masdar is the source used to report the death of the child soldier. It is a strongly pro-assad source. Should it really be trusted on a matter like that, if no other media reports it? 108.28.192.131 (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Media report every time child soldiers are used in Syria,
[1] [2] [3]Mr.User200 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Media report every time child soldiers are used in Syria,
Is Jaysh Thuwar ally or enemy of SAA? edit
They have the old Syria flag and supposedly are rebels.
172.98.152.102 (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
They are part of Kurdish-led SDF which is nominally neutral towards the Syrian government. EkoGraf (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Battel for Azaz. edit
I dont want to see the Future, WP is not a Crystalball but a possible Battle for Azaz should deserve its own article or not?Mr.User200 (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)