Talk:Non-price competition/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC) KOTE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.137.3.135 (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Merge

Why not merge this with competition (economics). If it is to remain, why not rename it Price and non-price competition - there's no rationale for redirecting price competition to non-price. Richard001 09:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

There is no need for it. The more articles there are in Wikipedia, the better. We can merge everythig together and create one mega-article, very comfortable, you just look-up what you need in it, economy, sience, politics, the price of tea in China, basketball, why not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.200.190 (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, IP. Your suggestion "[t]he more articles there are in Wikipedia, the better." makes me laugh out loud... Richard001 (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I think they should remain seperate, it is a different usage of the term "competition". Non-price competition is a specific feature of certain markets, usually oligopolistic ones. Prices are sticky (they don't really change) and companies compete by offering extra features, freebies, etc.

"Competition" as in Competition Law and Policy, is the general idea of that competitive markets deliver efficient outcomes. It is closely related to General Equilibrium models of the economy. AleXd (talk) 11:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Competition is about firms competing with each other for money, plain and simple. There are two ways that firms can do this: by having price wars, or by doing something else. I'm not a student of economics so if there is some other form of competition besides price and non-price that I'm leaving out, please let me know what it is. If not, it seems a pretty strong case for merging. Richard001 (talk) 05:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This, I thought, was funny: "other form of competition besides price and non-price [...]" Logically, there is no other form of competition since price/non-price is tautological. However, in all seriousness, economists typically model (such) firms as competing on price or quantity. "Non-price" competition, therefore, usually refers to some observable differentiation in quality, advertisement, service, tie-in good inclusion, etc, for a specific good. It's used (as mentioned previously) in oligopolistic and monopolistically competitive markets. Don't merge this article with competition. Bsdlite (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)