Talk:Nnn (file manager)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Secondary sources
Actually I wouldn't use (in anything I write) sources like that, since they're written by people without much in-depth experience on the topic. You might start by discarding all of those where the bloggist doesn't give a full name. TEDickey (talk) 00:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Tedickey: Thanks for commenting. Although these blog is not in-depth experience on the topic, I think these references is needed for the relevant sentence in the article because it's only the secondary source at this time. — Diki Ananta (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
How we stop this page from being deleted?
Subject JRwikifixer (talk) 11:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Improve the references - which has been done by 0xACED and IP:106.51.235.102. Vote at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nnn_(file_manager)
- - Snori (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Unsuitable sources
this is user-generated content (which one editor trimmed), and this is written by the developer of the program being discussed. TEDickey (talk) 19:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
this is a blogging site, not WP:RS TEDickey (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
this is probably not a reliable source, noting that it provides a pretty graph, talks about test programs but provides nothing to substantiate the review TEDickey (talk) 08:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)