Talk:Nier: Automata/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by TheJoebro64 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 21:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Snagging for later. JOEBRO64 21:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ProtoDrake: I'm going to start reviewing this before the end of the weekend. JOEBRO64 18:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Well that comment aged well. Should start by the end of the week lol. JOEBRO64 23:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @ProtoDrake: I am so sorry I still haven't started this yet, real life has gotten in the way, and when I'm on Wikipedia I'm usually doing something else. I promise it will be done soon. JOEBRO64 17:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Finally, here's my review, @ProtoDrake:. Again, I am so sorry for taking this long. I did some copyediting on my own, because I thought it'd be easier if I took care of that on my own. Here's what it stood out to me:

  • I think we should refer to Square, Platinum, and 8-4 as "it"/"its"/"which", not "they"/"theirs"/"whose". E.g. "... English dubbing was handled by Cup of Tea Productions, who which had previously..."
    • Did my best catching these.
  • "... features additional costumes, elements from the , ..." Uh, something's missing here
    • Whoops! My bad.
  • In the "collaborations" I'd add when the collaborations happened.
    • Dates added.

That's all I've got. Placing on hold. JOEBRO64 20:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@TheJoebro64: I hope I've addressed your concerns. Didn't think there'd be so few. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
ProtoDrake, alright, it's a pass! And yeah there weren't as many points as I was expecting either. Might be because I made changes I assumed would be uncontroversial. Anyway, I'm adding this to the GA list. JOEBRO64 01:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply