Talk:Newcomb ball/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by IMatthew in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  1. Has reliable sources   - A lot of unsourced statements.
  2. Is written neutrally   - Mostly, not completely.
  3. No valid cleanup tags  
  4. Is relatively stable with no edit wars  
  5. Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint  
  • Overall not ready. Recommend another peer review before coming back to GAN. iMatthew talk at 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply