applying double standards by requiring of Israel behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation; [2]
denying the State of Israel's right to exist as an equal member of the world community, and denying Jews the right to self-determination; [2][4]
using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis; [2]
holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel; [2]
spreading or failing to condemn wild conspiracy theories involving Jews, Zionists, and Israelis seeking to take over the world or committing mass murder or genocide (for example 9/11, Jenin); [5]
denying the importance of the Holocaust; insisting that it should have no policy or political consequences; [8]
engaging in straw-man attacks, wherein Jews are alleged to claim that any and all criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism, which is then used to condemn Jewish groups as unreasonable. According to Thomas Friedman, "[c]riticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is vile. But singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction — out of proportion to any other party in the Middle East — is anti-Semitic, and not saying so is dishonest." [9]
a resurgence of anti-Semitic attacks worldwide, particularly in Europe; not since Kristallnacht in 1938 have so many European synagogues and Jewish schools been attacked. [10]
^Matas, David. Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism. Dundurn Press, Toronto, 2005, pp. 129-144. ISBN 1550025538
^ Gross, Tom. "Jeningrad: What the British media said" in Those who forget the past. Ron Rosenbaum (ed.), Random House, 2004, pp. 137-144. ISBN0812972031