Talk:New Zealand place names/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found

Substantive review to follow within a day or so. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written and organised

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References are to RS, no OR, references support the statements

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Goo summary of the topic, with no concentration on trivia

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Licensed and captioned

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   No problems here, I am not sure why the previous review stalled. i am happy to list this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)