Talk:New York State Route 3/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Lpangelrob in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Are we okay here with using "interchange" as a verb? I never have, but I'm not about to say no one else can.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Consider adding an image of the historical alignment and adding it into the History section for bonus FA points.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Thorough, and with comparatively good prose (considering I've read a lot of articles in the past 3 days) to boot. Congrats! —Rob (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply