Talk:New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990)

Australia: New South Wales / Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

B class its well laid out I didnt find any significant gramatical errors. One thing though I was reading and it seamed to stop very abruptly as if something is missing. The importance of low is that as an Australian article its not overly significant, as an article to an Australian law project it would rate higher, even higher if the project focus was corporate or constitutional law. Gnangarra 10:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also additional references. A section on the wider impact of the decision would enhance the article and the understanding. Gnangarra 10:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article was rated as B-class by Gnangarra on 10:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC) as it covers the subject completely and would be of value for general information. It needs to be expanded to incorporate a larger reference base. Importance was assessed as low for the WP Australia project as the subject is only example of the legal system at work. GnangarraReply

Last edited at 10:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 01:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic