Talk:New Jersey Route 57/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by JamieS93 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Between the end of the first paragraph and the second (in the "route description" section), "Past this intersection" is used twice, and in total "intersection" appears three times within 2 sentences. It felt redundant as I read it, so could you try rephrasing?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Only one issue caught my attention, otherwise this looks like a nice article. JamieS93 be kind to newcomers 23:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
      DoneJuliancolton | Talk 23:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
    I've now passed this as a GA, thanks Julian. JamieS93 be kind to newcomers 23:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply