Talk:New Jersey Route 324/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 14:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

DABs and ELs are good.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The highway continues eastward, running through the dying trees and rotting fields until the trees begin growing in population." That sentence probably could use a rewrite. Otherwise the prose is fine after I made some copy editing.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just needs one sentence to be rewritten. Imzadi 1979 → 14:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

All done. Axed the sentence due to its redundancy. Mitch32^{(There is a destiny that makes us... family.)} 20:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Looks good. Imzadi 1979 → 20:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)