 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Changes
editchanges: Ted Byfield was linked to wrong Ted Byfield (no page for the professor of art). Ricardo Dominguez was also linked to the wrong person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.49.189 (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Membership list
editWhile it has its fascinating aspects, does the membership list belong in this article? At a minimum, I would propose dropping all red-linked and dab-linked entries. Is there a reliable source for the list? —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
I would be interested in digging through the mailing list for users up through ZPK5 (1999), ReadMe!, which is generally considered nettime's most important release. As I understand the group, that was its peak in influence. I could then source all contributors prior to that who have Wikipedia pages. I would think including Ted Byfield and Felix Stalder would be ok... I'm surprised they don't have pages themselves, as they've been influential in digital media studies. I'm not really a wikimedian though, jmcgnh, I've just been using this list of nettime participants to direct my personal studies for several years. What do you think? Is there a better way to do it? Should we really nuke the whole list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.23.98 (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- @74.108.23.98: After more than a year with no response, I am under the impression that this is not a closely watched paged. If the current list has been useful to you, then I wouldn't object to keeping it. But the question about verifiability remains. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Deletion of Bulk of Page
editSo I just undid a big change someone had made. They essentially deleted all the text. Insofar as "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia.", and given nettime's legacy, I think the 11,000 byte reduction without discussion was unwarranted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.23.98 (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)