Talk:Nature connectedness

Editing

Hey! I spent a long time editing your work mostly because something unexpected, unexplainable happened and suddenly I saw each of the sections twice. I think there were at least two people editing your article at the same time. Fortunately, I managed to fix it (at least I think I did).

Here are some editing comments I have:

• I adjusted wording here and there - mostly minor things. I also removed “you” from the text and substituted it with “one” because it sounds more appropriate for the Wikipedia (in my opinion).
• I used bullet points to present components of nature connectedness in your first paragraph, so it is easier to read and so it is easier to find information one wants.
• I added “Elizabeth Nisbet’s webpage” to the link you provided because usually there is some text people can click to go to a specific webpage (instead of just [1]). I did similar thing to many of other links. I also fixed some broken links.

Please feel free to change anything back if you do not like my changes.

Few suggestions:

• I am not sure such detailed descriptions of measures are needed. Shouldn’t you include only overall description of each scale (so people can find which scale is better to use for what they want to study) and leave out examples of items and statistical details? (The amount of measurement information is overwhelming.)
• You should probably rename “Interesting websides” as “See also:” or “External links:” - names commonly used within Wikipedia. Within that list you should provide a link’s name instead of a webpage address, e.g. Government Environmental Page and link imbedded within that name (there is a “link” button which lets you do it really easily).
• Within your references, journal names and their volume numbers should be italicized according to the APA style. (I changed it in some of your references.)
• This is really minor but shouldn't you put the picture a bit higher in your text, instead of it being next to the references list?

Sorry for being so critical... :_( (Kasob (Kasob (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC))

Impact of recent student edits

This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.

If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.

Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:

• 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
• 1 - A few minutes of work needed
• 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
• 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
• 4 - More than an hour of work needed

Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 19:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nature connectedness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106184406/http://www.conpsychmeasures.com/CONPSYCHMeasures/index.html to http://www.conpsychmeasures.com/CONPSYCHMeasures/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106184406/http://www.conpsychmeasures.com/CONPSYCHMeasures/index.html to http://www.conpsychmeasures.com/CONPSYCHMeasures/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Carleton University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)