![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Etymogy
editPalmer (1881) has the most contorsioned and implausible attempt at an etymogical explanation I've come across in a loong time. Didn't anyone come up with smth. slightly more resonable in the last 140 years? I wonder. Arminden (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)