Talk:Nakam/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Buidhe in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 17:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

I am reviewing this article as the WikiProject Germany Coordinator, and am on good terms with the article nominator, Buidhe (previously Catrìona).

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —Vami_IV♠ 17:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Prose

edit

Having read the whole article over, the only prose issue I was able to find is An attack on nearby The bread for Langwasser came from a single bakery in Nuremberg.

@Vami IV: Fixed. Thanks for the review! buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 21:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA progress

edit
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.