Talk:Nagar Brahmin

unreliable story full of prejudice

Wikified

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 15:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Peacock terms and possible bias

"Around great men gathers many a legend that obscures history. But what is history if not legend agreed upon ? This applies equally to Nagars - a great social group." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.61.24.5 (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC).

"Nagar history dates back to 10,000 years BC,supported by Nagar Khand in Skandh Puran [Nagar chapter given in Skandh Puran, a sacred religious book of Hindus world wide which is 15000 years old]" -According to [ sources], the Puranas were written in the past 2,000 years, and the Skandh Pura is dated to be around the 11th or 12th century CE. Juggadore (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)juggadoreJuggadore (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

References

aryan?

classification :Aryan

what does that mean ,please clarify.Nijgoykar (talk) 06:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

I just restored [1] sourced material on this that was deleted without explanation. Looks like it needs an rewrite and a close examination.

I've removed the classification bit as highly dubious. --Ronz (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nagar Brahmin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have added personalities from Prashnora section and few Vadnagara names of National fame. which are not found.Some names appearing are of persons of mediocre fame. Bharat pandya.

Last edited at 06:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 00:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)