Talk:NS VIRM

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Michael V 1988 in topic Warning copyrightabuse

{{subst:NS VIRM|NS DD-IRM}}, This should be moved as this is the actual name of the type.

VIRM or V-IRM is more actual than IRM.

Numbering?

edit

I also asked this question on the discussion page of the Dutch Wikipedia: Going through the captions of the IRM-pictures on railfaneurope.net I found several unit numbers that seem to have been a long and a short consist, e.g. 9505 and 8705 can be found and also 9507 and 8707. Is this correct? Are consists often - or at all - changed from four to six-car or vice versa? And was it the same with the former three and four-car consists? I found e.g. 8215 and 8415 (and 8615) or 8208 and 8408 (and 8608). As I also found 8491 and 8493 (!), I'm not convinced all numbers indicated are really correct. Thanks for any comments.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Warning copyrightabuse

edit

Dear members of Wikipedia,

The intro of this article and several others has been copied and used in the game Trainstation from Pixel Federation. It is in use on Facebook and the game is copyrighted bij the Pixel Federation. I don't know correctly if that is allowed, but I noticed it when I wanted to look up more information about other locomotives.

Your regards. Michael 1988 (from the Dutch Wikipedia). Michael V 1988 (talk) 22:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply