Talk:NPS MedicineWise

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Strange edit

Personally I find the info on the nps website strange. The references at the bottom to government websites are invalid. After hours of research I can't find a single link or mention of the nps from any Australian government website. I'll be back with proper info...

124.191.139.167 (talk) 18:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

EDIT: Back :) The nps sells itself as representing doctors, pharmacists, health professionals, etc. It's views are highly controversial. It is funded by the government..... WOW......come on!!!!!!!!!! this means nothing!!!!! They play it up like it means something! Not only that but the references that do work are dead ends and link to unheard of independent websites. I'm wondering what the actual FUCK is going on here....

Seriously someone needs to investigate this.

124.191.139.167 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

--Reply-- NPS is a brand name, the business name is National Prescribing Service. I am sure you can find document and information on DoHA website. DoHA: Department of Health and Ageing.

Article issues? edit

I've cleaned up the article a fair bit and would reckon that most if not all of the objections have been addressed accordingly. I'm curious as to where the claims of "original research or unverifiable claims" come in, though...thoughts welcomed. Teamabby (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Planning to remove Issues by end of April if no objections. Teamabby (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:Nps-socialmedia is editing this page, this is a conflict of interest. edit

We can't have organizations controlling information on their own wikipedia pages. Roidroid (talk) 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NPS MedicineWise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply