Talk:Mycena adscendens/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by J Milburn in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 22:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review; I can't imagine that there will be any major problems. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- "in what was then known as the Kingdom of Prussia" Why not "in what was then the Kingdom of Prussia"?
- Do we know the etymology of tenerrima or carpophila? farinellus, at least, is pretty obvious- perhaps they'd be worth mentioning along with the first mention of them? If you don't think it's important, feel free to ignore me.
- "The cap color is pallid gray with a whitish margin when young, but soon becomes white overall." How about "The cap is pallid gray with a whitish margin when young, but soon becomes white overall."?
- "are free" Jargon?
- You don't mention the "disc" in the description section; just the bulb
- "The spores are broadly ellipsoid, amyloid, with dimensions of 8–10 by 5–6.5 µm." Listy rather than prosaic?
- "sometimes forked at time" What does this mean? "sometimes become forked over time", perhaps?
- "and lacks clamps." Clamps have yet to be mentioned.
- The spore print isn't mentioned in the prose, but is in the box.
- Sources look fine. More specific page numbers for the Desjardin source would be useful.
The pictures are fine; generally seems like a solid article, and a good candidate for GA status. J Milburn (talk) 23:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)