Talk:My Prerogative/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Article is well written and complies to WP:MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references appear to be in order.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Article covers major aspects and remains focused on its subject.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article complies to WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article appears to be stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images comply with fair use rationales and are properly captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments:

• Wikilinks should only be made on the first mention. Remove repeated links.
• Wikilinks should only be made if they are relevant to the context. Common words do not need wikilinking.
  • I don't know which links you are referring to in both cases. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

These are very minor, for example, "Hollywood Hills", "Rolling Stone" and "Madison Square Garden" only need to be wikified on first mention. As they are minor, I have fixed them for you. -- S Masters (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

• On the February 4, 1989 show at Madison Square Garden in New York City, wore a red boxing robe with the words "King of the Stage" printed in the back. - Missing a pronoun. Y
  • Done. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
• Is it possible to include a clip of the song? Y
  • I'll see if i can find one. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Added for the two versions. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Summary: This article does not have major issues, except for what I have mentioned above. I will allow up to seven days for these to be fixed.

Final summary: Thank you for your hard work in making this a better article. I am now satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and am happy to pass it for GA status. -- S Masters (talk) 04:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)