Talk:Mukhmas
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mikhmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207052201/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_pcbs/populati/pop08.aspx to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_pcbs/populati/pop08.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Schick typo edit
Schick, p. 121, writes that this locality is on Socin, p. 153. That is clearly a typo, this place is on Socin, p. 158 (The number of inhabitants, 120 males, is correct) Huldra (talk) 22:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
change name of entry edit
The name should be Mukhmas and not Mikhmas, according to Socin, p. 158 and the Arabic vocalization חיים לוי (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
We have "Main article: Michmas" link, and I would argue that Michmas-stuff belongs in the Michmas-article, not here. Comments? If others disagree, then I suggest opening a RfC about it, Huldra (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Virtually all articles about cities, towns or villages in the Israel/Palestine region which have biblical connections mention that explicitly in the "history" section (or in a dedicated section, usually called "Biblical Connection"). I don't see why Mukhmas should be any different. Tombah (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- IFF there is no article about the Biblical place: yes. But it is not usual that we re-iterate content from one article into another article, Huldra (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, we shouldn't re-iterate content from one article into another. Maybe this is not the article to expand on the Battle of Michmash. But in any case, the general, biblical reference must stay. Tombah (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Well, the Battle of Michmash has zero non-Biblical sources, and the Michmas-article is also severely lacking in non-Biblical sources. This is Wikipedia, not "Bibliopedia"; the (Hebrew) Bible cannot be used as a source of history here. We link to the Michmas-article here; IMO that is enough.
- And instead of edit-warring, I wish you you would spend your time adding academic studies to articles like the two mentioned; Huldra (talk) 22:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, we shouldn't re-iterate content from one article into another. Maybe this is not the article to expand on the Battle of Michmash. But in any case, the general, biblical reference must stay. Tombah (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- IFF there is no article about the Biblical place: yes. But it is not usual that we re-iterate content from one article into another article, Huldra (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Virtually all articles about cities, towns or villages in the Israel/Palestine region which have biblical connections mention that explicitly in the "history" section (or in a dedicated section, usually called "Biblical Connection"). I don't see why Mukhmas should be any different. Tombah (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)