Talk:Mpumalanga Witchcraft Suppression Bill/Archive 1

Archive 1

Issues

This article has major issues with original research, referencing, and neutrality. Most of the "Background" section deals with the conflation of witchcraft in African Traditional Religion with the (Western) pagan movement, and the Mpumalanga bill really has not much to do with Western paganism. There are no inline cites, and some pretty non-neutral claims. "The draft Bill [...] will imprison self-defined Witches on the assumption of automatic inference of criminality," is exaggeration at best. About half of the external links are dead. Also, no mention is made of the fate of the bill; as far as I can tell it wasn't even introduced in the legislature. - htonl (talk) 11:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

I have added sections and references to this article and will continue to improve on it piecemeal in due course. Feedback appreciated. HelenOnline (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

As I just mentioned on your user talk page, I think you have pretty much covered all the issues I identified. Thanks! - htonl (talk) 10:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mpumalanga Witchcraft Suppression Bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)