Talk:Mountains of Kong

Maps Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Huh?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"In 1928 Bartholemew's Oxford Advanced Atlas still contained them in its index locating them at 8° 40' N, 5° 0' W.[1] Even later they appeared erroneously in Goode's World Atlas of 1895.[5]" How can 1895 be later than 1928?Kdammers (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Conspiratorial Content

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article contains statements about the author's personal beliefs that are unrelated to the to Mountains of Kong. Specifically in the 'Related Naming' section, which states:

"Shouldnt[sic] this be of some evidence that a significant portion of what was provided as fact cause each of us to rightfully question what we have been taught?[sic-grammar] What else have we been deceived with?" 2601:543:C000:4C:C5D3:B458:CE55:F394 (talk) 21:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic