Talk:Moments (One Direction song)/GA2

GA Reassessment

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reassessor: Till (talk · contribs)

How this was passed as a Good article is something beyond me.

Issues

edit
  • Infobox—source for songwriter is not needed.
  • Lead—the article is too short to contain 2 paragraphs for the lead.
  • taken from the deluxe edition of their debut studio album Up All Night. --> Year?
  • The song received positive reviews from music critics, praising the song's memorability and compositional structure. --> Past tense to present?
  • Background—In an interview, Sheeran talking about the song, stated, --> Huh? This doesn't make sense. And anyways, what interview?
  • Composition and critical reception—these two sections don't go well together.
  • According to the sheet music published by EMI Music Publishing --> Unnecessary
  • Written in the key of D major; vocal elements range from the note of D4 to A5. --> Awkward prose
  • "Moments" is a pop ballad --> Should be stated earlier in the article
  • What the f*ck makes the 'Sugarscape' and 'Pop & Glory' sources reliable?
  • Charts—add 'sortable'
  • Two pictures is a little much for such a short article.
  • References—every 'work' paramater that isn't a printed source should not be in italics. There's some over-linking going on (e.g. Allmusic, Rovi)
  • This hardly feels like a GA. It's so short.

Overall

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Till 08:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I notified the main contributer to the article 10 days ago and they have made no effort to address the issues. As such, I am delisting this as a GA. The article can be renominated any time but I would suggest that the above remaining issues are fixed. Till 00:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.