Talk:Molecular Borromean rings

Topology of a Borromean ring

For the record this image has a wider licence than the current image V8rik 16:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Pendant

I am ignorant of chemistry beyond the secondary-school level and I had never seen this sense of the word pendant before finding it in this article. It appears to be a technical use of that word, but no Wikipedia article titled pendant (chemistry) or the like seems to exist. Would creation of such an article be in order? Michael Hardy 03:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

• Hi Michael Hardy, I was totally unaware that the phrase pendant can lead to confusion but I am not a native English speaker. It is not something typically technical or chemical so there is no need for a separate article. To me (and my dictionary agrees) pendant is equivalent to something like counterpart. I would not replace it by is an example of. V8rik 16:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

• • Which dictionary is that? I just looked in the Oxford English Dictionary and I don't find that sense. Michael Hardy 02:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
    • that would be my English to Dutch dictionary. But once again I am not qualified to make a call and our co-editor Stone has already made a change. So the matter should be closed. V8rik 18:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Molecular Borromean rings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050313214459/http://www.liv.ac.uk/~spmr02/rings/chemistry.html to http://www.liv.ac.uk/~spmr02/rings/chemistry.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)