Talk:Mojave Desert/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, but this one's gonna have to be a quickfail.

• The climate section is almost completely unsourced
• weather2travel.com is used as a source for temperature data; it is an unreliable source
• the geography section is unsourced, and also incomplete. We'll want to know about specific natural features
• Cities and regions is mainly unsourced
• The natural features such as Devils Playground in the cities and features section could possibly go in the geography section or something like that
• Highways and major roads is a single sentences; needs expansion
• Parks and tourism is largely unsourced
• the list of musuems should be a prose paragraph
• the flora section needs expanded
• The fauna section should not just be a giant list
• Soil and plant conditions and protection sections are both unsourced and too short. More detail is needed on these topics
• The West Mojave plan litigation is undue weight.
• Too many see also links - see MOS:SEEALSO
• What makes constructioncompany.com a reliable source?
• what makes parlorsongs.com a reliable source
• All items in lead should be in body, there is stuff like the native name that is unique to the lead.

This is nowhere near to the GA criteria, so I will have to quickfail it, unfortunately. Hog Farm _Talk 23:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the helpful criticism. I will begin working on this immediately. AurumIsGold (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)