Talk:MoEDAL experiment

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

references edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much of the content seems to be a straight cut and paste of the MoEDAL web page, which itself seems to be a cut and paste from another document.

http://moedal.web.cern.ch/content/search-pseudo-stable-massive-particles-smps — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.53.213 (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

MOS:BADEMPHASIS edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

User:Headbomb apart from it being ugly, the two correct styles to choose from my understanding that are commonly seen in use are bold for alternative titles, and italics for the expansion when not an alternative title. I copied the camelcase from a source to keep it as an alternative title, so bolded it. We're not meant to explain the acronym per MOS:NOBOLD Avoid using boldface (or other font gimmicks) in the expansions of acronyms . Further, this double emphasis is also to be avoided by MOS:BADEMPHASIS Double emphasis, such as "italics in quotation marks" or italics and an exclamation point!, is unnecessary.. Please can you reconsider. Widefox; talk 22:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Headbomb: (rare that I find myself pinging someone for two unrelated things). Widefox; talk 01:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic