Talk:Missouri Route 162/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   • Any info on when the diamond interchange at I-55 was built? And any cost there?
     • Cost added.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 06:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
   • "and its section from Clarkton to Gideon was paved one year later." -- Any cost on this?
   • As with Route 164, I can't immediately tell if the first sentence in the route description is a traffic count for this route. Is it, and if not can that number be found?
     • Fixed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 06:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
   • Finally, perhaps would be good to include if there are any landmarks or notable businesses on this one, or if it's an all residential road. I get it's a rural place but the information seems a bit basic as is now.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Pass Sources are largely maps, but not spotting any holes in citing. —Ed!^(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Pass No problems there.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass No problems there.

5. It is stable:

   Pass No problems there.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   • No images here, technically possible but not feasible unless we had someone on WP living nearby, which isn't likely. Any chance for a map?

7. Other:

   Dup links, dab links, external links and copyvio tools all showing no problems.

   Source spotcheck Ref 7 and Ref 14 are appropriately referenced to the content in the article.

On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Good work on this one! Passing for GA. —Ed!^(talk) 20:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)