This article is almost all speculation and personal opinion.

edit

Wikipedia is not a place for editors to pose hypotheses, or infer how extinct creatures might have acted. Unless there are reliable scientific sources backing up the speculation presented here, it should be removed, no matter how detailed or well-illustrated. The info on Greece and most of the Lifestyle sections are especially lacking in direct relevance to the subject of the article, Miomachairodus. --Animalparty-- (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Followup: I've added merge tags to Bahe Formation and Yeni Eskihisar, where, assuming adequate, sourced information exists, it would be more applicable to discuss there. Other sections are almost entirely off-topic. WP needs to be based on verifiable facts, not opinions. Rather than an article about Miomachairodus, this article is fluffed up with inference, speculation, and original synthesis by editors about what the animal might have been like. Please read Wikipedia:No original research. --Animalparty-- (talk) 23:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply