 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
o ←→ o̞ edit
In the examples, is the use of [o], rather than [o̞], intentional? Isn't one of the aims of this article to point out the distinction between the two? Using the same symbol for both is, in my opinion, counter-productive to that end. Dan ☺ 15:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that makes sense. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 00:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mid back rounded vowel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131211020607/http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/ell/staff/amalia-arvaniti/docs/Greek%20Phonetics%20-%20The%20State%20of%20the%20Art.pdf to http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/ell/staff/amalia-arvaniti/docs/Greek%20Phonetics%20-%20The%20State%20of%20the%20Art.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.taalportaal.org/taalportaal/topic/pid/topic-14610909940908011
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
The amount of rounding edit
Is there any research on whether [o̞] typically has more rounding than the cardinal [ɔ]? When I listen to Greek, Japanese or Spanish, their /o/ seems to differ from my Polish /ɔ/ by the amount of rounding it has ([o̞] is more rounded), rather than the exact tongue position which is only slightly higher. I know that Polish /ɔ/ is only weakly rounded, but so is cardinal [ɔ] (it's only slightly more rounded). It'd be fascinating to see a similar study regarding [ø̞] vs. [œ]. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
@Kbb2: which Serbo-Croatian dictionary uses namely U+00F4 for it? Moreover, may a serious source use U+00F4 ô LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX in a Cyrillic text? Please, don’t defend random Wikipedian trash. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: HJP and Rečnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika just to name two. The latter is written in entirely (or almost entirely) in Cyrillic. Also, check Wiktionary. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kbb2: where is specifically U+00F4 which you defend against me? Don’t evade the question. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: Obvious typo is obvious, so let's not split hairs. The error has been fixed. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 12:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kbb2: where is specifically U+00F4 which you defend against me? Don’t evade the question. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)