Talk:Michael Jackson's This Is It/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: W.D. (talk · contribs) 12:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead is OK, but maybe could do with more factual evidence, for example, how could it be proved that there was a large amount of demand from fans?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Maybe it isn't original research per se, but there is a lot of reference to the wishes of his fans which as I said, cannot be proven, and judging by the article, hasn't.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Seems to explain well enough the major aspects, also very detailed in places.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral, shows multiple opinions on the film.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable,no recent controversies or anything.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Appropriate captions, free images where available.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Except some minor issues, this is generally a good article.