Talk:Michael Cammalleri/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   very good and easy prose

   there should be more information about his religiosity; does he practice Jewish traditions? Or is he more liberal?

   Sources conflict on this point. The "Cammalleri is Jewish" opening line is not my addition but I realize that it isn't going anywhere without an edit war. one source says he observes Jewish holidays. Another says he was raised secular. A third gives no indication of the importance of religion in his life. Lacking a consistent message, I prefer to leave the section as is. Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   the "by whom" tag in the last picture's and the playing style section should be resolved.

   Reworded for clarity. Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

   high-quality sources

   overall good reference formatting, but the dates were inconsistent, so I changed to classic mdy format.

   I fixed one minor error in one reference

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   no trivia; focused

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   no bias

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   as semi-protected

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   high-quality pictures are properly licensed

7. Overall: I see you are a WikiCup entrant, and you have only 10 points :/. Sorry for the delay, I was busy, but also a bit lazy :).

   Pass/Fail:

   No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up. Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns. Thanks! Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)