Talk:Meze Audio

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 206.169.29.254 in topic Needs to be flagged for tone

I'm sorry to see that this page has been marked for deletion. I do believe this page is worthy of Wikipedia inclusion. There are many other Wikipedia pages about headphones, and Meze headphones are notable due to their unusual construction from ebony wood. I was researching the headphones and was unclear about the benefits of the wood enclosures. I was also intrigued as to why these headphones had earned themselves such a status in the audio world. I decided that these headphones were worth a Wikipedia mention, being handcrafted and unusually constructed. They stand out against other headphones, which is why they deserve a page.

I really enjoyed writing this Wikipedia page, and did my best to reference and link to other pages successfully. Having relied on Wikipedia for years, I felt that it was time I made my contribution; I wrote about Meze headphones because I searched them myself and found no results on Wikipedia, therefore I'm sure others will be doing the same. Roseradtke (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Meze Headphones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Needs to be flagged for tone edit

This article sounds like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.29.254 (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply