Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Kyle (2002)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): It is well written with tight prose. b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Article subject places in contex b (focused): Well focused on subject of article

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral in viewpoint

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A good job as usual! Article passes GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)