Talk:Melampus nuxeastaneus

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melampus nuxeastaneus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718024709/http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.2007.52.2.145.pdf to http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.2007.52.2.145.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Name is Wrong

"nuxeastaneus" is an extremely obvious error (probably a scanno) for "nuxcastaneus". The first is meaningless, but the second is Latin "nux", meanng "nut" and "castaneus", which is an adjective derived from "castanea", which means "chestnut (tree or nut)" . This makes perfect sense if you know what a chestnut looks like, and also if you know that there's another species named Melampus castaneus, named in 1818 (though there seems to be some confusion as to whether the specific epithet was "castanea", which would be a noun in apposition, or "castaneus", which would be an adjective agreeing in gender with the generic name) . Since the preferred name wasn't available when Kuroda published in 1949, he would have altered the name slightly to avoid a conflict.

It's true that there are other hits on Google with "nuxeastaneus", but there are also some with "nuxcastaneus", such as WMSDB. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

After a little digging, I found the original publication of M. castaneus, which was for "Voluta castanea, Die Kastanienbraune Faltenschnecke". Since "Voluta" is feminine, and the German name translates to "chestnut-brown", that confirms that M. castaneus should be correct- which doesn't look good for the credibility of the Taiwania reference. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:34, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melampus nuxeastaneus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713123757/http://www.jpnrdb.com/search.php?mode=map&q=110504140010667 to http://www.jpnrdb.com/search.php?mode=map&q=110504140010667

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)