This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Where the heck on Paleofile does it say that it's all CC? Lythronaxargestes (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
No where. Basically the entire article is fictional based on some non-existent remains of the taxon (which is only based on a tooth). IJReiddiscuss 08:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
I believe that Yewtharaptor, the creator of the article, is a long standing issue on the wiki FunkMonk? IJReiddiscuss 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's a "species article" too, so I think it should just be redirected to Megalosaurus immediately. FunkMonk (talk) 15:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The article shows the first taxon considered a Dinosaur, found on Poland. Now the false information is out.
There are still no inline citations. If this is not fixed soon, I will redirect the article to Megalosaurus. Though it should actually be redirected in nay case. FunkMonk (talk) 19:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
See it as a preliminar version. At the end of this week it will be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 23:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Several edits where just hidden because they were copyright violations, so that settles it; the article has been redirected. If you want to add sourced, non plagiarised text, do it in the Megalosaurus article, where this taxon is already discussed. FunkMonk (talk) 09:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
