Talk:Maxim Lapierre/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Leech44 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've done a quick read of the article and checked for dead links. Everything is looking very good so far. I'm going to spot check some of the references and do a double check of grammar, but this article will probably be a quick pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Changed game-winner to game-winning goal more clarification for people who may not be familiar ice hockey. It also sounded more encyclopedic to me.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    no dead links spot checks of refs provided accuracy
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    All images contain proper licensing. The two images from flickr have been verified.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I didn't find any major issues with this article so I've gone ahead and passed this. Great work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 00:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply