Talk:Max Mosley/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 4u1e in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
I will review this article. I have familiarized myself with its recent GAR discussion. Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 18:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
First Review by Robert Skyhawk edit
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I have reviewed this article, and it appears to meet the Criteria for Good articles.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- I am impressed by the thoroughness of the citiations for quotes especially.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Again, this article definitely meets the criteria in my opinion. The issue about the Nazi organization which was raised during its reassessment seems to be resolved. Congratulations to User:4u1e and all other involved editors. I will now proceed to take all necessary steps to award this article GA status. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 20:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Many have contributed, but Tommy turrell is the other major contributor. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. 4u1e (talk) 20:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)