Talk:Max-Hellmuth Ostermann/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

For some reason my questions weren't displaying. I presume that he did get married. A date would be good. Did he have a child?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately the sources at my disposal do not give me more insight into his personal life. If you know of some more sources to consult I will gladly do so. The story about him getting married is a side note in Bergström's book. If resolving this is a show stopper for GA, so be it. I can't change it even if I wanted to. MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
At least you've managed to find something out about his private life. However, be advised that you should get more detail on it if you want to take this to A-class or better.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply